Like any other red-blooded American male on a Sunday afternoon, I like to exercise my right to surf the television channels using my remote control from the comfort of my easy chair. Years ago, when there was only four channels on TV, such a device wasn't really needed, but now with the hundreds of available channels, it would be unimaginable to live without one. Nonetheless, I was flipping through the channels and started to notice something...
CLICK - a show describing the men and women serving in our military. The show highlights their spirit of teamwork and sacrifice for the betterment of all.
CLICK - a documentary describing the proliferation of street gangs and how people become territorial and find ways to beat the system for personal greed and vice.
CLICK - a Wall Street report on the virtues of the free enterprise system and how the entrepreneurial spirit of small companies promote job growth.
CLICK - a show describing the plight of the homeless and why it is necessary to redistribute the wealth in this country.
CLICK - a report on the Tea Party and 9.12 movements.
CLICK - a community talk show featuring a college professor discussing why conservative values are no longer valid in the world today.
CLICK - a variety of shows providing a forum to worship God.
CLICK - a program discussing the point of view of atheists and agnostics who want to have "In God we Trust" removed from American currency.
It struck me there were extreme opposites for just about everything in our society. The incompatibility between extremes is such, you start to wonder how this country survived for over 200 years. Then again, I guess it is not surprising as America's melting pot represents a heterogeneous society, most definitely not homogeneous. This is nothing new and has been with us a long time. Also, think how boring our society would be if we all thought the same.
The only difference is we no longer practice tolerance and have forgotten how to engage in honest debate. For example, on the Internet, rarely is there any respect for other opinions and beliefs. Instead, people are inclined to viciously attack others and slander their character, a sort of "attack mode" of operating. I guess this is the price we must pay for becoming a technology based society.
French writer Voltaire is credited with saying, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." I don't think people feel this way anymore. Instead of talking through a problem or issue, as all of the great civilizations have done before us, we have to suffer through spin and attack. Plain and simply, we no longer know how to practice the art of honest discourse, which I interpret as a sign of deterioration of our culture.
We may not always agree with each other, but we must find ways to work together, not apart. This requires tolerance, respect, and the need to be a heck of a lot more articulate than just saying, "Up yours!"
Such is my Pet Peeve of the Week.
Keep the Faith!
Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.
Tim Bryce is the Managing Director of M. Bryce & Associates (MBA) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com
For Tim's columns, see:
http://www.phmainstreet.com/timbryce.htm
Tune into Tim's new podcast, "The Voice of Palm Harbor," at:http://www.phmainstreet.com/voiceph.htm
Copyright © 2009 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.
Tim, while I agree with you about defending one's right to speak their mind, there is one big difference that I see today that historically seems different than generations past: total disregard of the United States Constitution. The people of today seem ill advised as to their rights and even more ill advised as to when those rights disintegrate. This government seems to see the Constitution as a social roadblock or even worse, as totally useless. Congress doesn't make laws within the framework of the Constitution but in spite of it.
ReplyDeleteTolerance is a double-edged sword. While being tolerant about our neighbor's difference is crucial in our country, when it tramples our God-given and Constitutional rights it becomes the means to the end of our great country as it was founded.
God bless the United States and what it once stood for.
I think this is a debate "honesty", the rest is pure poetry. Here in Argentina was discussed a law to regulate the media under the premise that he would be loyal to the principle of diversity and freedom of expression but many know that what we want to do is silence the voices that are coming to give more place other than that by numbers and diversity can hardly necessary financial support and spread to affect political or economic interests.
ReplyDelete