THE WISDOM OF DOBIE GILLIS

BRYCE ON LIFE

- A subtle yet simple suggestion for improving life.

(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

As a kid, a favorite television show of mine was "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis" which aired on CBS from 1959 to 1963. It also appeared in syndication many years afterwards. I'm not sure many adults followed it at the time, but the kids became addicted to it as it was one of the few shows examining the trials and tribulations of a teenager transitioning into adulthood. Dobie (played by Dwayne Hickman) would usually open the show next to a statue of Rodin's "The Thinker" where he would give a monologue to the television audience pondering a specific aspect of life. Although it was intended to be a comedy, Dobie questioned such things as family relationships, attracting the opposite sex, money, education, ethics; questions we all ask ourselves particularly at a young age. Even though it was done with humor, there was usually a profound message to each episode, at least to Dobie, which is why youth gravitated to the show. As an aside, I particularly enjoyed Dobie's father, Herbert T. Gillis (played by Frank Faylen), a cantankerous, hard-working WW2 vet who owned a local grocery store. We could all relate to the family dynamics in the Gillis household.

Not long ago, I was pleased to discover the show was played on an "oldies" cable channel but in the wee hours of the morning. Fortunately, I was able to DVR it, and watch it at my leisure. There was one episode which I found particularly interesting, "Names My Mother Called Me," where Dobie is invited to meet a Nobel Prize-winning scientist who inspired his unusual first name, Dr. D.W. Klein, whose character was based on Albert Einstein, the great physicist. Today's generation would compare him to British physicist Stephen Hawking.

In this particular episode, Dr. Klein wants to retire and pursue other interests. As Dr. Klein has greatly influenced how people think and view the world around them, the press is hounding him for one final statement regarding the meaning of life. A press conference is arranged, but prior to attending it, Dr. Klein calls for a meeting with Dobie Gillis (of all people), who is surprised by the invitation. As it turns out, Dobie's mother (played by Florida Friebus) knew Dr. Klein many years ago and asked his permission to use his first name. Dr. Klein was flattered by the request and, consequently, quietly watched Dobie grow up from afar. This, of course, surprises Dobie, but he wonders how he can help the doctor:

KLEIN: "I spent a lifetime trying to make the world a better place to live in, but what is the world except the people who live in it? And what are the people who live in it except a lot of individuals, like you."

DOBIE: "Dr. Klein, you've done a wonderful job of making the world a better place to live."

KLEIN: "Is it much of a place to live in right now?"

DOBIE: "Well..."

KLEIN: "The truth."

DOBIE: "It's miserable."

KLEIN: "You bet it is, and part of the reason is that people like me who try to improve life have been too busy to live it and learn what it's all about."

--

KLEIN: "Dobie, at the age when you were dancing with Thalia Menninger (Tuesday Weld), I was locked in a laboratory working out a theory that only a few eggheads like me even cared about. While I was standing by observing, you were living, you were part of life, I was outside it. Now tell me, which of us is in a better position to give advice on what the world needs?"

DOBIE: "Me? Oh, no..."

KLEIN: "You, yes, that's why I'm going back to fundamentals, to the basic primitive things. I've got to try to learn the things you already know. And that's the advice I want from you Dobie: What does the world really want from life?"

DOBIE: "Oh, come on Dr. Klein, what does a kid like me know about that?"

KLEIN: "Plenty, because you lived life. Now speak up Dobie, don't be a prima donna."

DOBIE: "Well, I guess I want what everybody wants, happiness."

KLEIN: "What is happiness?"

DOBIE: "Honestly, Dr. Klein..."

KLEIN: "Don't poke along Dobie, get to the point."

DOBIE: "Well, one part of happiness is having a girl."

KLEIN: "A girl? Well, a girl, of course."

DOBIE: "And friends, people you care about, people who care about you."

KLEIN: "Yes, that we know."

DOBIE: "Well, everybody wants a chance for an education, so they can learn how to make a living, and they want some time to enjoy themselves after they're through working so they can make that living mean something. And, of course, they want peace, or else none of the rest of it means anything."

KLEIN: "Peace? Well we've all tried; how would you go about achieving that Dobie?"

DOBIE: "Well, for openers, I'd try to make people more polite."

KLEIN: "Well, I'm all for that, but how do you think politeness would bring about peace?"

DOBIE: "Oh, sure it would! Well, I don't mean polite only on the surface like taking your hat off on elevators or using the right fork. I mean polite inside, in your heart, an honest respect for the other guy's feelings and opinions, even if you don't agree with him."

KLEIN: "Ah-ha, that doesn't seem like too much to ask, yet it's everything isn't it?"

DOBIE: "They need one more thing, one more thing, time to dream about better days, about a fine new world."

KLEIN: "That's a heck of a fine dream."

DOBIE: "It's a heck of a necessary dream, because, well, we've got to dream before we can plan."

KLEIN: "Indeed, you do. Dobie, those people out there, they're waiting for some final word from me, some memorable message."

DOBIE: "They sure are. They made me promise to get it to them."

KLEIN: "So you will."

DOBIE: "Yes sir. I'll get a pencil and write it down."

KLEIN: "No Dobie, you're going to give them the message, your own message."

DOBIE: "Me? Oh no, come on now Doctor..."

KLEIN: "You, of course; Dobie, you're the hope of the world, you and millions of others like you. Young enough to dream, young enough to make those dreams come true. Now go Dobie, give them the message they're waiting for. I'm going to sneak out the back door; crowds bug me."

DOBIE: "But I can't speak for you."

KLEIN: "Says who? What they want from me, I can no longer give them. You can; you can give them hope. Now go on son. And son, speak up, now don't mumble, I'm counting on you."
 

As implausible a scenario as this episode represents, that a scientific genius would seek the advice of a young adult, it does offer a simple yet profound message, that the world would be a better place if we just treated ourselves with a little love and respect. It may sound corny, but there is nothing wrong with what Dobie is proposing. If you read the dialog closely, you discover the characters considered the world a mess, as well as their socialization skills and discourse at the time, something we have all been feeling lately. I was pleasantly surprised by the show's message and was startled by the parallel between now and back then (51 years ago).

A little politeness, eh? I'm not sure that will play any better in the 21st century than it did in the 20th. I can only hope.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com

For Tim's columns, see:   timbryce.com

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

THE INFORMATION CURTAIN

BRYCE ON THE MEDIA

- What can be done about the media's stranglehold on the news?

(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

Winston Churchill is credited for coining the expression "The Iron Curtain" to describe the separation of communist countries in Europe following World War II. In essence, the former Soviet Union built a wall around eastern Europe and kept its citizens in the dark. For many years, eastern Europeans secretly tuned into the Voice of America to find out what was really going on in the world which was in stark contrast to the Soviet propaganda machine. The Iron Curtain wasn't raised until 1991 when the Cold War finally came to an end. Similarly, there was a "Bamboo Curtain" surrounding Communist China to keep the Western World out. Both curtains represent an approach to keep the citizenship in line, and propaganda was an inherent part of manipulating the masses.

Today we have an "Information Curtain" that is essentially no different than the Soviet system, yet much more sophisticated in terms of controlling the people through the dissemination of truthful facts. So much so, an incestuous relationship now exists between government and the press, which, in theory, is supposed to be independent but is now nothing more than an arm of the government with considerable swagger to dictate legislation and elect officials at all levels of government.

The Information Curtain dictates what news and information is to be released to the public, and how it is to be presented ("spin"). The media's stranglehold of news is such that trust in the media continues to decline with the result being a public totally ignorant of the facts despite the availability of easy to use technology to access information. Frankly, more and more people have stopped reading newspapers, and watching the news on television simply because they no longer trust the media. As evidence, consider a September 21, 2012 poll by Gallup, entitled "U.S. Distrust in Media Hits New High." In it, Gallup contends "Americans' distrust in the media hit a new high this year, with 60% saying they have little or no trust in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly. Distrust is up from the past few years, when Americans were already more negative about the media than they had been in years prior to 2004."

Should the media be interested in restoring its credibility, a major cleanup is in order. First, consider the "Journalist's Creed," a code of ethics written around 1906 by Walter Williams shortly after founding the Missouri School of Journalism. His intent was to devise something similar to the Hippocratic Oath as taken by physicians swearing to practice medicine ethically and honestly. The Creed reads:

"I believe in the profession of Journalism.

I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of responsibility, trustees for the public; that all acceptance of lesser service than the public service is a betrayal of this trust.

I believe that clear thinking, clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism.

I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true.

I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible.

I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one's own pocket book is as much to be avoided as bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another's instructions or another's dividends.

I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service.

I believe that the journalism which succeeds the best-and best deserves success-fears God and honors man; is stoutly independent; unmoved by pride of opinion or greed of power; constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient, always respectful of its readers but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice; is unswayed by the appeal of the privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance, and as far as law, an honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship, is a journalism of humanity, of and for today's world."

In theory, all journalists are to adhere to this code, yet I personally do not believe there is anyone following this pledge anymore, and I suspect a lot of Americans would agree with me. So what can be done to restore the integrity of the media, or to lift "The Information Curtain"? First, like any profession, how about revoking a license to practice news? Since other craftsmen and professionals must periodically update their certification to practice their craft, why not the media? And, No, they should not police themselves. An independent body should handle such certifications, and certainly not the government.

Consumers could also boycott the media, but that has never proven effective in modern times. Instead, it would seem to make more sense to institute a certification system with a board to review reported violations of the code of ethics and sanction penalties for violations. Just about every other profession has such a system, why not the media? Maybe then we could learn to trust the media again and finally lift "The Information Curtain."

Then again, maybe they are not interested in restoring their integrity. After all, the money and control is probably better under the current system.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com

For Tim's columns, see:   timbryce.com

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

DETECTING SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES

BRYCE ON SYSTEMS

- It's actually not too difficult to spot weaknesses in your systems.

(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

Our company has been conducting Systems Audits for a number of years, and by this, I do not mean analyzing computer hardware and software but, rather, the information systems used throughout a corporation, such as a manufacturing system, a finance system, a billing system, etc. It's actually not too difficult to find deficiencies in a system. If you've done it as long as we have, it becomes rather routine. We've encountered systems that couldn't accommodate foreign languages and local nuances, systems that were difficult to port across different computing environments, and systems that were plain and simply awkward to understand and use ("user nasty" as opposed to "user friendly").

When we begin an audit, we're not so much interested in the programming languages used and other issues pertaining to technology. These may be mildly interesting, but we're more interested in the business problem to be solved and the parts of the organization served. In particular, there are three areas we concentrate on:

1. Documentation - as used in recording design specifications and as an operations manual. As a design tool, there should be sufficient documentation to describe the system architecture and its various components, e.g., inputs, outputs, and files. Unfortunately, this is an area which is typically neglected, if not abandoned altogether. There should be no excuse for this as there have been a multitude of documentation aids available (both graphics and text) for over 35 years, not to mention simple paper and pencil (anybody remember plastic templates?). There is simply no excuse for operating without such tools. It is impossible to maintain your systems without adequate documentation and, consequently, the systems will need to be replaced in its entirety in a short period of time (two to three years at most). Further, "firefighting" becomes the normal mode of operation in the Information Technology department.

From an operations perspective, there should be sufficient documentation to provide instruction in how to use the system, such as administrative procedures, samples of inputs and outputs, and operations considerations, such as backup and recovery. Unfortunately, this is an area that is also neglected. Even simple help text is often omitted or inconsistently applied. Without sufficient instructional materials, the system will be underutilized at best.

2. Lack of data integration - the only way systems communicate internally or externally with other systems is through shared data. Failure to design systems without such integration means it is possible for different systems to produce different calculations, such as inconsistent sales figures. It also leads to...

3. Data redundancy - which is common within most companies today. Although data dictionaries and Data Base Management Systems (DBMS) were deliberately designed to help prevent data redundancy and promote data integration, it is easy to create redundancy if one is so inclined. This is what happens when a DBMS is used as nothing more than a data access method as opposed to what the tool was designed for (sharing).

To determine if any data redundancy exists, we begin by searching on some key data elements as used by the company, such as Customer Number, Product Number, Part Number, Employee Number, etc. These are high profile data elements which will lead to the identification of duplicates, inconsistent data definitions (e.g., length, Validation rules, etc.), and locate data dependencies (those elements bound to the key item). From this, we can quickly determine the number of duplicate data assignments and if systems are sharing data. As an aside, I have yet to find an organization with only one definition for Customer Number.

If a company is inputting the same data element multiple times, there is no guarantee they are doing it in the same manner. If the data is inconsistent, how can we trust the information about such things as Customers, Products, Parts, Employees, etc.? The point is, we cannot which leads to considerable headaches within any company.

If data is assigned redundantly, it means there is also redundant work effort, if for no other reason than to input the duplicate data elements.

By studying these three variables (documentation, data integration, and data redundancy) we can find most of the problems with any information system. Try it yourself. If you encounter these variables, you probably do not trust the information you receive from your systems, your end-users likely have an adversarial relationship with the Information Technology department, and your development staff lacks uniform discipline and organization.

As I said, after you've examined a few systems over the years, it becomes rather easy to spot problems.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com

For Tim's columns, see:   timbryce.com

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

FINDING A MATE

BRYCE ON LIFE

- Dating and matchmaking as another casualty of technology.

(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

I've been married to the same lovely lady for over 30 years now and if something were to happen to us, I don't think I would ever re-marry. Been there, done that. Not everyone shares my view though and desperately needs to be attached to someone. My wife and I originally met in high school, one of about five couples from our class who married their sweetheart. Others found their mate in college, others at work, or in the locale where they lived. During the 1970's, it was common to cruise the discos in search of love or whatever. In a way, it was reminiscent of SNL's The Festrunk Brothers (Czech Brothers) routine. There certainly was a lot of polyester back then. Disco though had a short life, thank God, and the bar scene was the predominant means to meet the opposite sex. This lifestyle could be rather expensive and lead to alcoholism and other problems, but it was what it was.

Today it's much different. People rarely socialize in group settings, dancing has diminished greatly, and people are stuck staring at their computer screens or texting on their smart phones. The bar scene is still active but not like it once was. For years, there were "Personal" columns in the newspapers for lonely people to find others. In order to save a nickle or two, a shorthand was used in the personals to describe people and their interests, such as: SWM, DWF, BMF, etc. The "personals" are still around of course, but the predominant means now is to seek companionship through social media on the Internet. Instead of writing and waiting for personals to appear in print, Internet dating services are the venue du jour. This is another example of how we are sacrificing socialization for speed and efficiency. People seem to prefer the Internet for their matchmaking as they can read the background and qualifications of a person, and see their photo. It also provides some pretty impressive sorting features in order to assemble a list of potential candidates.

If you are on the dating scene, you know there is now an extensive list of dating sites available to you. The big guns seem to be:

Match.com

eHarmony

Perfect Match

Plenty of Fish

Interestingly, newer sites have been introduced based on your religious inclination, for example:

Christian Mingle

JDate - Jewish singles

Single Muslims

Even ethnic dating sites are now available:

Black Singles

Latino Singles

Asian Singles

And there is one tailored to seniors as well:

Senior People Meet

There are so many dating sites now, you can find one for just about any religion, ethnic background, or city and state. However, I struck out when I searched for Lithuanian singles who are with the Salvation Army. I guess there are still limitations.

I have met subscribers to these on-line dating services who tell me these venues are "snake pits" (their words) where people want to live in Fantasy Land. There seems to be a lot of people who want to travel to Europe, walk on the beach, drive around in luxury cars, eat at fine restaurants, or sip wine on the back of a yacht. They want someone else to pay for it of course. Unfortunately, there's no mention of fiscal responsibility.

Then there is "Speed Dating," a relatively new concept where men and women circulate in an organized manner whereby they are given a few scant minutes to meet and quickly determine if they find someone suitable for dating. I guess this was inevitable for a technology induced go-go world. We used to do something similar when we went dancing years ago. It wasn't quite as structured as "Speed Dating," but I think it was a lot more fun.

In bygone times, if you were single, your choices were either the bar scene, neighborhood parties, church groups, work, or you would have a friend or relative on the lookout for a suitable match for you. I'm not saying this worked any better than today, but I suspect it was more interesting. Today there are professional matchmakers who earn a rather handsome amount of money by teaming people up.

Despite all of the technological advancements we have made, dating and matchmaking is still a rough sport. People of both sexes agonize on finding the right man or woman. Even with these slick Internet based dating services, it remains difficult to find a suitable match. Rarely does the person live up to their photo or description on the dating site. What I find particularly comical about all this though is after a couple has finally secured a date, they go to a restaurant, sit down, order their drinks and meal, then spend the rest of the evening checking their text messages.

God how I miss the 20th century.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com

For Tim's columns, see:   timbryce.com

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

GRIDLOCK

BRYCE ON POLITICS

- The country votes for two more years of government stagnation, maybe longer.

(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

Not knowing how the presidential election was going to turn out, I wrote two separate articles depending on the outcome, one if President Obama won the election, and one if Governor Romney had won. Now that we know the outcome, we can proceed.

By a narrow margin, Barack Obama retained his job as president of the United States. It was certainly NOT a mandate, but rather a simple plurality. Nonetheless, it is still his job to perform and we can only hope he can somehow reduce the unemployment rate, balance the budget, and cut the federal debt. Regardless of what you thought of Mr. Obama before the election, it is up to him to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Whether he is able to do so is questionable as the country will continue to spiral downward thanks to the gridlock between the Congress and the Oval Office.

Unlike President Clinton, who was able to work with a Republican Congress, it is more likely the president and the GOP will remain at loggerheads, at least until the next Congressional election in two years. If the last two years are any measure, the country will increase the federal debt, unemployment will remain high, and the direction of the country will continue to spiral out of control.

The Republicans will have to go back to the drawing board in order to retake the White House. No matter how they spun it, Mitt Romney was more of a moderate than a conservative. John McCain was essentially no different in 2008. Now, with Mr. Obama firmly in charge of the White House, I believe the next GOP contender to emerge will be a true conservative. If the government stagnates, as I suspect it will, the Tea Party will likely grow and flourish over the next two years and will no longer back down from senior Republicans who are moderate in nature. The conservative movement will become more robust and take control of both houses of Congress in 2014. After that, the White House in 2016.

Four years ago, I wrote a column on "Presidential Legacies." In it, I publicly thanked President Bush for his service to the country. I was ridiculed for doing so, but I was unapologetic and remain so to this day. Interestingly, Mr. Obama's legacy will not be his policies or actions (some would say "inactions"), but for re-awakening the conservative movement in this country. It's an interesting dichotomy whereby the more President Obama wins, the greater his opposition grows. Conversely, if he loses, the conservatives weaken. Consider this, had Barack Obama lost in 2008 it is highly unlikely the Tea Party would have ever surfaced, and the Democrats wouldn't have lost the House of Representatives in 2010.

Let's just hope I'm wrong and that the country will work out its differences. You'll excuse me if I do not hold my breath.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com

For Tim's columns, see:   timbryce.com

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM

BRYCE ON POLITICS

- Twas the night before elections and all through the house...

(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

Fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a bumpy ride. We have only one more day of obnoxious and slanderous television and radio ads to suffer through before we're free, at least for two more years until the next electoral cycle begins. I'll be curious to see how many billions of dollars was wasted, er, ah, "spent" on the media thereby making them even more glutenous and overbearing. God forbid we should spend such exorbitant sums of money on something worthwhile, such as correcting the ills of our country. I am still of the opinion that for every dollar spent on political campaigning, another dollar should be donated to a worthy charity or cause, such as paying off the federal debt. That would take the wind out of the media's sails and actually accomplish something worthwhile to boot.

If the 2012 campaign did anything, it confirmed my belief the electoral process is horribly broken and in need of repair. I cannot think of a campaign in the last fifty years where the truth was so expertly butchered. Suddenly, "fact checkers" are a natural part of our vernacular. Remarkably, the fact checkers themselves need to be checked. The point is, nobody is credible anymore and we are suspicious of the truth regardless of how cold the facts may be. No wonder there are two distinctly different perspectives of the world. At the center of it all is the media, the true winners of the election whose best interests are served by keeping the public in the dark.

The elections on Tuesday will be the only reprieve we will have from the political madness. People will go to their precincts, vote for someone they really do not know, or for an amendment they do not understand. Some will vote based on name recognition alone, and some will vote as Oprah or Jon Stewart wanted them to. Very few will actually know what they are voting for. Yes, I still advocate the concept of voter certification.

We will go to bed proud of fulfilling our civic duty, only to wake up to a nightmare on Wednesday morning. No matter how the presidential election turns out, one half of the country will be unhappy which may very well lead to civil unrest. I remember going to bed on election night in 1976 thinking Gerald Ford had it in the bag, only to wake up to the nightmare of that peanut farmer.

So, enjoy your day off before the festivities begin; catch up on some "ZZZ," maybe take in a movie, have a few drinks, hide your money, stock up on ammo, whatever. After this timely respite, the country is going to be a lot different, one way or another, and a lot of people are not going to like it.

Oh yea, one other thing: If you don't vote, don't bitch. You had your chance.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com

For Tim's columns, see:   timbryce.com

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

IN PRAISE OF SOPHIA LOREN

BRYCE ON LIFE

- Why we still find her attractive at age 78.

(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

Over the years, men have had favorite pinup girls; during the 1940's there was Betty Grable, Rita Hayworth, and Jane Russell; in the 50's there was Marilyn Monroe, Gina Lollobrigida, Jayne Mansfield and Elizabeth Taylor, and during the 1960's there was Brigitte Bardot and Raquel Welch. I don't know who the latest sex symbols are these days, but they have a hard act to follow as far as I am concerned. There was one, in particular, that captivated the public for a number of years, Sophia Loren, an Italian actress with incredible looks and acting skills.

Loren has spent over sixty years in the public eye, which is a tribute to her endurance. At age 78, she still looks fabulous. If you were to ask people which actress appeals to both sexes, you would be hard pressed to find someone who can top Sophia Loren. It's more than just looks too. She's starred in movies opposite such notable leading men as Clark Gable, Cary Grant, Frank Sinatra, Marcello Mastroianni, Richard Burton, Charlton Heston, Peter Sellers, Paul Newman, Gregory Peck, and Marlon Brando. She was always able to hold her own against such heavyweights and won numerous acting awards, including being declared in 1991 as "one of the world cinema's treasures."

Even though she was always admired for her beauty and acting skills, there is something else that captures the imagination of her fans, some sort of mystique she possesses, perhaps it is European or Italian in nature. I think the word I'm looking for is "class." In public, I have never known her not to be the picture of poise and grace, yet she seems to be very down to earth, very approachable. She is a sort of royalty who can relate to her subjects, probably because she remembers her modest beginnings. It is this sense of class, coupled with looks, that makes her attractive to both men and women, and you see it in just about every film she has made, as well as in interviews.

When the movie "Grumpier Old Men" was produced in 1995, she was already 61 and making fewer films. People wondered if she still had "it" to play a femme fatale opposite Walter Matthau and Jack Lemmon, and competing with Ann-Margret. She had "it" alright, helping to make the movie a box office success. On the screen, she still exuded class and sensuality.

Sophia is still active but has understandably slowed down her volume of work. Now and then, she will appear at a public function and still looks smashing in her cleavage revealing gowns; even better than a lot of actresses a third of her age. So, if I had to vote for a favorite pinup, I would have to give the nod to Sophia Loren. She has looks, class, longevity, and a certain savior-fare about her. She certainly has "it."

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com

For Tim's columns, see:   timbryce.com

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.